Skip to main content

Celebrating Love Data Week: sector, funder and drivers for open data

The University Library's research services team are celebrating International Love Data Week which runs from 10 - 14 February 2020. We support researchers and PhD students, in learning about effective data management practices, services and tools as well as how to organise your data, and advise on routes for data deposit, ensuring that, where feasible, you can make your research data outputs open, accessible, and discoverable for others to discover and reuse.

We are publishing a series of themed blog posts this week on a variety of research data management topics and we are of course always available for face-to-face research data consultations to chat about your research and data outputs, providing support for data management plans, outreach and advocacy within departments and colleges, and we provide and support the research data infrastructure Figshare at Leicester, for those who wish to deposit their data in our institutional data repository, when a disciplinary one is not available.

Nugent, Marie; O'Regan, Laura (2018): HeLa cells undergoing metaphase. figshare. Figure. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.7406534.v1 
The hashtag for Love Data Week is #lovedata20 and our second post is a brief overview of some of the sector news around open data and data sharing.


Open data - ongoing challenges and benefits

As outlined in the annual Figshare publication The State of Open Data Report 2019  there is some encouraging trends around the acceptance and adoption of open data. Some key findings from the report resonate with us as very often when we do our data advocacy and engagement, it is often mentioned that there are concerns around data sharing and possible misuse of data, interpreting funders' requirements & policy compliance, the challenges of making data available and also the lack of reward and recognition for making the effort to be more open in practice. Some of the key findings from the report:

  • 79% of 2019 respondents were supportive overall of a national mandate for making primary research openly available
  • 67% of respondents think that funders should withhold funding from, or penalise in other ways, researchers who do not share their data if the funder has mandated that they do so 
  • 69% of respondents think that funders should make the sharing of research data part of their requirements for awarding grants
  • 36% of respondents expressed the concern that their data may be misused if it was shared
  • 42% of researchers would be encouraged to share their data if it resulted in a co-authorship
There was an interesting piece in the THE in January which caught my attention:

Open data ‘tougher’ than open access and needs ‘mindset change
Huge rewards could ensue if governments bankroll the systematic sharing of research data, but experts warn of unintended consequences
It covers this question of reward and recognition and also about the funding required to support the infrastructure and also the skills necessary to drive forward this open data agenda.

Other items of interest that I have been watching closely include The Wellcome Trust's January press release and associated statement for the sharing of research data and findings relevant to the novel coronavirus (nCoV) outbreak. 

We call on researchers, journals and funders to ensure that research findings and data relevant to this outbreak are shared rapidly and openly to inform the public health response and help save lives.
The signatories to this statement are significant and all have a commitment and awareness of the public health benefit to sharing data widely and as quickly as possible. 

Also in January 2020 at the 'Data Summit in Paris' nine major networks of research-intensive universities signed the Sorbonne declaration on research data rights. One of the interesting aspects of this declaration is that universities and their researchers are encouraged to share data as much as possible.

If you are interested in sharing your research data then further information and contact details are available on our RDM website.






Popular posts from this blog

You can now export multiple citations from Google Scholar

You can now export multiple citations from Google Scholar if you have a Google Account. Go to Google Scholar and sign into your Google Account. Conduct your search. Click on the Star icon (Save) under each reference you want to export. Then click on My Library in the top, right of the screen. Select all the references and click on the Export option: Click the Star/Save Icon Choose Export Option To Export into EndNote Choose the EndNote option. Open the EndNote file that is created. The references should automatically import into EndNote. To Export into RefWorks Choose the RefMan option. Save the RIS file that is created. Login to your RefWorks account. Click on the plus (+) button. Choose Import References. Add the RIS file you just saved. Set the file import option to RIS - Reference Manager. Click import and your references will be imported. --- Good Practice Tip: Always check that all the reference information you need has been

Searching ABS Journals in Business Source Premier

In Business and Management Studies, researchers undertaking a literature review sometimes search across a defined group of journals. This is a way of focusing the literature search to make the results more relevant to the questions in hand. Groups are often chosen from the Association of Business Schools (ABS)'s  Academic Journal Guide . Read more how about how they put together the guide here . There are several ways to search across ABS journals. Here is how to do it in Business Source Premier, a leading literature database for this subject area.  1.     Login into the ABS journal guide. If you have never used it before you will need to create an account. 2.     You can use the guide to draw up a group of journals either by using the Rankings information or the Fields. Fields divides up the journals into categories of research focus e.g. Accounting, Finance etc. In this example we will use the Fields. The field we are interested is ‘Operations Research and Marketin

Advanced Search Tip: Proximity (Adjacency) Searching

Proximity (Adjacency) Searching vs Phrase Searching When you're searching literature databases you might want to find a phrase. The easiest way to do this is to put the phrase in "speech marks". E.g. "heart disease" This will find that exact phrase - with the words next to each other in that order. BUT... You may be interested in variations on that phrase e.g. heart disease, disease of the heart, diseases of the heart, diseases of the human heart. In that case it might be better to use a proximity/adjacency search - this allows you to find one keyword next to another. Or one keyword within a specified number of words of the other keyword. When using a proximity search the keywords can be in any order. Different Databases Use Different Proximity Operators In Ovid Medline : heart adj disease finds the word heart next to the word disease, in that order.    (This is the same as searching for the phrase, of course) heart adj2 disease fin