Skip to main content

My author’s manuscript isn’t as good as the publisher version ...

By Grant Denkinson, open access lead in Library Research Services. 


I have heard a number of times from authors, particularly in the humanities, that they are less enthusiastic about Green route Open Access. They say the final author version they make available is not as useful or aesthetically pleasing.

Since the looks of an author version are up to the author(s), I think there is a trade-off between time taken on look and feel vs time spent on other things, and perhaps diminishing returns on usability and enjoyment.

A few issues to consider:

Location: If you were given this paper without further context, as might happen if someone shared with a colleague via email or a collaborative workspace, would you know exactly what it is? Consider putting the citation at the front. Often the version of record will have a persistent identifier, a DOI, and we produce an identifier in our repository: a handle.net address. These should continue to work if websites are rearranged or moved. We are considering adding coversheets to documents to help with this.

Changes and comments: If you have been using change tracking or have reviewer comments in your manuscript, consider stripping them out and just sharing the final text. Most common authoring tools such as Word have this as an option.

Accessibility: I recommend making your work as widely available as possible and not disabling potential readers. Many ways of making a document more accessible also benefit users with mobile devices and allow computers to parse the work increasing discoverability. I won’t go into detail here but perhaps take a look at https://www.adobe.com/accessibility/pdf/pdf-accessibility-overview.html or other guides. We use PDF/A as an archiving format. If your manuscript contains data, consider sharing this as a supplement or using our University of Leicester research data repository
Some journals provide templates to help with style so you can do much of the typesetting yourself. There may be templates shared within your academic community also.

The future: Perhaps we will move to having both PDFs and other formats that lend themselves to uses other than replicating print.

Popular posts from this blog

Oral history at the University of Leicester

As announced recently, we will be hosting the CILIP Local Studies conference on July 9, which will be themed around oral history and sound collections. We choose oral history thanks to the University's, and the region's, strengths in this area. East Midlands Oral History Archive (EMOHA) Based in the Centre for Urban History,  East Midlands Oral History Archive is one of the largest regional collections of its kind. It was o riginally funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund to establish an archive of oral history recordings for Leicestershire & Rutland. It includes the collections of the Leicester Oral History Archive, the Mantle archive from North West Leicestershire, the Community History archive of Leicester City Libraries, the Market Harborough Museum collection, and the sound archive of BBC Radio Leicester, along with smaller collections donated by local organisations or individuals. Following a major digitisation project, the Library's Special Coll...

Research Elevenses in July

Throughout July we are running a series of 30 minute talks on key issues for Leicester researchers. There’s no need to book - just turn up! If you are off-campus you can join in live via Adobe Connect. Simply click the link and choose ‘Enter as Guest’ on the day. A recording of each session will be made available after the event. 6th July Discovering the University’s unique archives 11am, Fielding Johnson, Ogden Lewis Seminar Room 3 This session will explain what archives are and give an overview of the archives held by the University of Leicester library.  Participants will also be introduced to the online archive catalogue and effective ways to locate archival sources to support teaching and research. Join the webinar 13th July Publishing your own Open Access journal 11am, David Wilson Library Seminar Room, Floor 1 The Library has developed an online publishing platform (Open Journals System) that enables researchers at Leicester to set up and run their o...

You can now export multiple citations from Google Scholar

You can now export multiple citations from Google Scholar if you have a Google Account. Go to Google Scholar and sign into your Google Account. Conduct your search. Click on the Star icon (Save) under each reference you want to export. Then click on My Library in the top, right of the screen. Select all the references and click on the Export option: Click the Star/Save Icon Choose Export Option To Export into EndNote Choose the EndNote option. Open the EndNote file that is created. The references should automatically import into EndNote. To Export into RefWorks Choose the RefMan option. Save the RIS file that is created. Login to your RefWorks account. Click on the plus (+) button. Choose Import References. Add the RIS file you just saved. Set the file import option to RIS - Reference Manager. Click import and your references will be imported. --- Good Practice Tip: Always check that all the reference information you need has been...